# The AI 'news anchors' spreading misleading claims about Singapore on TikTok

- Date: 2026-07-17
- Added: 2026-07-17
- Who: CNA (CNA report) · CNA
- Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3zh_TenNa4
- sgai: https://sgai.md/videos/v074/
- License: sgai-authored content (summaries, translations, analysis) is CC BY 4.0 — attribute and link to sgai.md. Verbatim source text (Hansard, speeches, transcripts, policy documents) remains © its original rights holders and is reproduced for reference only. Terms: https://github.com/meltflake/sgai/blob/main/DATA-LICENSE.md

## Why it matters

Cross-border AI virtual hosts spreading disinformation in bulk test FICA and POFMA's actual jurisdiction over foreign platforms and foreign actors

## Summary

CNA's investigation uncovered over 550 TikTok videos using AI-generated female personas, with nearly 9 in 10 spreading false or misleading claims about Singapore and Malaysia.

## Full text

© CNA — reproduced for reference only.

They look like presenters, they sound authoritative, and they speak confidently about Singapore and Malaysia. But here's the catch. Many of them don't actually exist. Over the past 9 months, a CNA investigation has uncovered more than 550 TikTok videos built using AI-generated, manipulated, or copied female personas. Almost nine in 10 of them push false and misleading claims. Among the more outrageous claims, one video falsely claims Singapore's Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan had backed China and Indonesia not to let a new shipping route bypass Singapore's port. It never happened. The thing is, these videos don't look like propaganda. They look more like ordinary geopolitical or financial commentary, and that makes them harder to spot. Together, the videos racked up more than 3 million views.

Many start with real news before distorting facts and ending in a misleading conclusion. [music] One claims Singapore's port was on the verge of collapse because of a new Chinese shipping hub. Another used ExxonMobil's plant closure as supposed proof that Singapore is in decline. Neither claims reflect reality. CNA also found the same scripts being repeated by different presenters. Sometimes different accounts use the exact same voice. Other times, the same face appeared with different voices. The result? It looked like independent creators reaching the same conclusions when they instead appeared to be part of the same content production line. Experts say that's exactly the point. The campaign doesn't have to convince people all right. It just has to make certain narratives feel familiar.

Experts warn repeated narratives like these can erode trust and deepen divisions over time. Experts also say spotting fake faces or AI glitches is becoming harder. Instead, you should watch for the playbook. Different accounts repeating the same talking points, claims that aren't reported anywhere else, and repetition replacing evidence. Because while the faces may change, the tactics often don't.